<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Crypto Law on Blockchaining.org</title>
    <link>https://blockchaining.org/tags/crypto-law/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Crypto Law on Blockchaining.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blockchaining.org/tags/crypto-law/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The SEC&#39;s Crypto Taxonomy Finally Gives the Industry Something to Work With</title>
      <link>https://blockchaining.org/2026/02/14/the-secs-crypto-taxonomy-finally-gives-the-industry-something-to-work-with/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blockchaining.org/2026/02/14/the-secs-crypto-taxonomy-finally-gives-the-industry-something-to-work-with/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For most of the past decade, crypto companies operating in the United States have been navigating regulatory uncertainty using a combination of legal creativity, jurisdictional arbitrage, and optimism that clarity would eventually arrive. The SEC&amp;rsquo;s enforcement-first approach — pursuing actions against specific actors rather than publishing comprehensive guidance — left the industry in the position of learning the rules from the outcomes of cases it was not party to.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The taxonomic guidance that the SEC published in early 2026 does not resolve every question. It resolves enough of them to allow compliance functions to make decisions they have been deferring for years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
