<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ETF on Blockchaining.org</title>
    <link>https://blockchaining.org/tags/etf/</link>
    <description>Recent content in ETF on Blockchaining.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blockchaining.org/tags/etf/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Bitcoin ETF Inflows Are Rewriting the Institutional Playbook</title>
      <link>https://blockchaining.org/2025/09/15/bitcoin-etf-inflows-are-rewriting-the-institutional-playbook/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blockchaining.org/2025/09/15/bitcoin-etf-inflows-are-rewriting-the-institutional-playbook/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States did not produce the immediate market euphoria many anticipated. What it produced instead was something more durable and more consequential: a structural shift in how institutional capital accesses digital assets. Eighteen months in, the data is no longer ambiguous.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;BlackRock&amp;rsquo;s iShares Bitcoin Trust crossed $20 billion in assets under management faster than any ETF in history. Fidelity&amp;rsquo;s product followed closely. The combined inflow figures from the first cohort of spot Bitcoin ETFs have exceeded the most optimistic pre-approval projections, and they have done so without the retail mania that characterized the 2020 and 2021 cycles. This time, the buyers are different.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
