<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Opus Caementicium on Blockchaining.org</title>
    <link>https://blockchaining.org/tags/opus-caementicium/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Opus Caementicium on Blockchaining.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blockchaining.org/tags/opus-caementicium/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Roman Concrete in Museum Fragments: What the Cross-Section Actually Shows</title>
      <link>https://blockchaining.org/roman-concrete-in-museum-fragments-what-the-cross-section-actually-shows/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blockchaining.org/roman-concrete-in-museum-fragments-what-the-cross-section-actually-shows/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Museum displays of Roman building material tend to be badly labelled and quickly walked past. A broken lump of wall behind glass with a card reading &amp;ldquo;concrete, 2nd century AD&amp;rdquo; gives a visitor nothing. Which is a shame, because the cut face of that lump contains most of the answer to why Roman structures are still standing.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Here is what to look for when you find one.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-wall-is-a-sandwich-and-the-pretty-part-is-the-formwork&#34;&gt;The wall is a sandwich, and the pretty part is the formwork&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The single most common misreading is treating the visible facing as the wall. It is not. Roman walls of this type consist of a thick core of mortar and rubble, faced on both sides with a thinner skin of stone or brick that served as permanent shuttering during construction and as a finished surface afterwards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
